MINDO DEVI ALIAS MINDO vs STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M-259-2026 and CRM-M-342-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-259-2026 Mindo Devi alias Mindo …...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …...Respondent CRM-M-342-2026 Rekha …...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …...Respondent Decided on: 06.05.2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Mikhail Kad, Advocate for the petitioner(s) (in CRM-M-259-2026) Mr. Sandeep Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner(s) (in CRM-M-342-2026). Mr. Vinay Malhotra, DAG Punjab **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (ORAL) 1. By way of this common order, both the above-mentioned petitions are being decided together as they arise out of the same FIR and common allegations. 2. Both the aforesaid petitions arise from FIR No. 90 dated 07.03.2025, registered at Police Station City Barnala, District Barnala, under Sections 22, 29, 61 of the NDPS Act. REENA 3. As per case of the prosecution, a secret information was received 2026.05.07 05:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-259-2026 and CRM-M-342-2026 regarding the presence of total four accused namely (i) Mohit Sharma @ Makhan, (ii) Whisky Singh @ Biski, (iii) Rekha (petitioner in CRM-M-342