Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-14

MEHAR CHAND PARASHAR AND ANR vs STATE OF HARYANA ETC

Citation / case number
CRM-M 37267/2016
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MEHAR CHAND PARASHAR AND ANR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA ETC
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

2026:PHHC:076468 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 248 CRM-M-37267-2016 Date of decision : 14.05.2026 MEHAR CHAND PARASHAR AND ANR ... PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- | None for the petitioners. Mr. Vijay Kumar, AAG, Haryana. 2K H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for setting aside the condition of furnishing bank guarantee of Rs. 50 lacs qua each petitioner, vide order dated 07.10.2016 (Annexure P-3), for permission to go abroad, passed by the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge, Panchkula, in FIR No. 257 dated 31.12.2015, under Sections 406/420/120-B IPC at Police Station Sector 14, Panchkula and for modification of the said order in this regard. 2. At the very outset, learned State counsel, upon instructions, submits that the trial in the aforesaid case has already concluded, wherein three accused persons have been acquitted while one of them has been declared as a proclaimed offender. 3. In view of the above especially when the proceedings in the main case have already concluded, no further orders are required to be passed in this petition and