MEENU GOYAL vs SUBIR GOYAL

2028. PHHC i | IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH IOIN-CR-655-2009; CM-3159-CII-2009 IN/AND CR-655-2009 Date of Decision: 26.05.2026 Meenu Goyal .... Petitioner Vis Subir Goyal ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: None. ae VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) The case file got burnt, as a result of which, after the matter having been put up, intimation was given to learned counsel for the parties. 2. As per the report of the Registry, no document could be procured so as to reconstruct the record. It has further been reported by the Registry, that learned counsel for the petitioner could not be contacted on telephone as his phone was unreachable. 3. That being so, let the file be consigned to record. Parties shall, however, are at liberty to move an appropriate application for revival of the petition, in accordance with law, in case they are interested in pursuing the same. 4, Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE May 26, 2026 Mani Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No ON OMAR Whether reportable: Yes/No | attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document