Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-05-13

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 6673 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 6673 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 6673 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6673 of 2026 Smt Dhanwanti .....Petitioner(s) Versus Satendra Kumar And Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yash Padia Counsel for Respondent(s) : Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Yash Padia, learned counsel for the plaintiff-petitioner. 2. In view of the order which is being proposed to be passed, notices are not being issued to the defendant respondent. 3. The case of the plaintiff-petitioner is that the plaintiff-petitioner had instituted a Civil Suit No. 125 of 2026 before the Civil Judge (J.D.) praying for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, its agent and servant from taking forceful possession of any part of the undivided plot no. 247 area 0.160 hectares situated at Himatpur, Nasirpur, Pargana, Tehsil & District Eta. Along with the said suit, an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 also came to be preferred and the trial court by virtue of the order dated 23.02.2026 passed an order of status quo. However, an appeal came to be preferred by the defendant-respondents before the court of District Judge, Etah bearing No. 24 of 2026, however, despite objectio

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 6673 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam