Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-05-08

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 6457 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 6457 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 6457 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6457 of 2026 Ashutosh Agrawal .....Petitioner(s) Versus Dr Vijay Kumar Tayal And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rama Goel Bansal, Shalini Goel Counsel for Respondent(s) : Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Ms. Rama Bansal, learned counsel for the petitioner-defendant, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices are not required to be issued to the respondent-plaintiff and the proforma respondent- defendant. 3. The case of the defendant-petitioner is that Original Suit No. 309 of 2020 came to be instituted by the plaintiff-respondent no. 1 before the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bijnor, being Vinay Kumar Tayal vs. Arun Kumar Tayal, with the allegation that a power of attorney was executed by the plaintiff in favour of defendant no. 1 and, by practicing fraud, defendant no. 1 sold the property to defendant no. 2 on 19.10.2006 and thereafter defendant no. 2 sold the property to defendant no. 3, who happens to be the petitioner herein. The suit was instituted for cancellation of the sale deed da

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 6457 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam