MASTAN SINGH vs SAKSHI SAHNI AND ANOTHER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 221 COCP-394-2026 Date of decision : 12.05.2026 Mastan Singh ...... Petitioner versus Sakshi Sahni and another ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Naresh Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Ishar, Addl. A.G., Punjab. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. Allotment order has issued. Counsel for the petitioner however submits that the plot ought to have been allotted on the rate as was prevalent on the day the petitioner became entitled for allotment and not on the current rate. 2. Keeping in view the limited jurisdiction vested with the Contempt Court, this Court grant liberty to the petitioner to seek his grievance before the Writ Court by moving an appropriate application. 3. Disposed off, accordingly. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 12.05.2026 Dinesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No DINESH KUMAR 2026.05.15 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document