Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-01

MANVEER vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 21944/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MANVEER
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-21944-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 215 CRM-M-21944-2026 Date of Decision: 01.05.2026 Manveer ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. K.D.S. Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J (ORAL) 1. Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNSS”), the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.60 dated 21.02.2026 under Sections 115, 118(1), 190, 191(2) 333, and 351(2), registered at Police Station City Tohana, District Fatehabad. 2. On 22.04.2026, following order had been passed by this Court:- “Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0060 dated 21.02.2026, registered under Sections 115, 118(1), 190, 191(2), 333, 351(2) of BNS, 2023, at Police Station City Tohana, District Fatehabad. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the DINESH BANSAL 2026.05.01 15:34 I attest to the accu