Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-13

MANOJ vs VEER BHAN @ BHANVEER AND ORS

Citation / case number
FAO 5624/2017
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MANOJ
Respondent
VEER BHAN @ BHANVEER AND ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

137 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-5624-2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.05.2026 Manoj ...Appellant Versus Veer Bhan @ Bhanveer and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Ms. Deepika, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Jatin Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for respondent No.3. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that she is not aware as to what had happened before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court and prays that the present appeal be disposed but liberty be granted to the appellant to revive the same after finding as to what had happened before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. 2. In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of with liberty aforesaid. 13.05.2026 (VIKAS BAHL) Pawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.05.13 14:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document