MANOJ JAIN AND OTHERS vs UT OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 109 CWP-9922-2026 Date of Decision: 15.05.2026 Manoj Jain and others …Petitioners Versus U.T. of Chandigarh and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Karan Nehra, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. A.P.S. Maan, Additional Standing Counsel with Mr. Shubham Chaudhary, Junior Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 Mr. Arun Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Punjab Mr. Shruti, Advocate for respondent No.7 (through video conferencing) Mr. Udoi Yoshvir, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Suri, Advocate for respondent No.8 Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate (through video conferencing) and Mr. Rajat Thareja, Advocate for respondent Nos.9 and 10 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. Replies filed on behalf of respondent Nos.9 & 10 are taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 15.05.2026 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2026.05.15 15:51 I attest to the