Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-12

MANOHAR LAL SHARMA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 33260/2023
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MANOHAR LAL SHARMA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

133 CRM-M-33260-2023 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33260-2023 Date of decision: 12.05.2026 MANOHAR LAL SHARMA ….Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gagandeep Singh Chhina, Sr. DAG Haryana. ..… RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and as such, seeks withdrawal of the present petition. Accordingly, present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn as having been rendered infructuous. (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 12.05.2026 JUDGE puneet i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No PUNEET SHARMA 2026.05.13 16.32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment