Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-11

MANJIT SINGH vs JAGRAJ SINGH AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CR 6133/2022
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MANJIT SINGH
Respondent
JAGRAJ SINGH AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-6133-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.05.2026 MANJIT SINGH ....Petitioner V/s JAGRAJ SINGH AND OTHERS .…Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. N.S. Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Munish Garg, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3. *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) The instant revision petition assails the order dated 08.12.2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Barnala, vide which the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure (for short ‘CPC’) for rejection of plaint, was allowed and the petitioner/plaintiff was ordered to affix ad-valorem court fee on the amount of compensation claimed. 2. The facts, as emanating from the revision petition are that a suit for damages and compensation on account of registration of a false case and for the loss suffered by the petitioner/plaintiff (Annexure P-2) was instituted with the following prayer:- “Therefore, by filing this plaint, it is prayed that the suit of Rs.27,50,000/- being damages and compensation for lodging a false case and loss suffered may kindly be decreed in favour of the plaintiff