Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-11

MANISHA DEVI vs STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

Citation / case number
CWP 6899/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MANISHA DEVI
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CWP-6899-2026 1 2026:PHHC:073667 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.110 CWP-6899-2026 Date of Decision: 11.05.2026 Manisha Devi .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, assisted by Mr. Harmanjit Singh Johal, Advocate. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to reimburse the expenditure incurred by the petitioner on her husband’s medical treatment. Specific details of the medical bills or the amount of medical expenditure have not been mentioned in the petition. The only averment in this regard is in para 5 of the petition, which mentions that she ‘had submitted the Bill dated 31.07.2020 to 02.08.2020, 23.11.2020 to 01.12.2020, 05.10.2020 to 26.10.2020 and 20.07.2020 to 25.07.2020 and all have been sent by the School to the higher authorities with all the requisite formalities. Application of petitioner dated NIL is annexed as Annexure P-1’. Details of the amount claimed are not there even in the said