Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

MANINDER SINGH THROUGH HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SATNAM KAUR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CRM-M 24576/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MANINDER SINGH THROUGH HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SATNAM KAUR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 146 CRM-M-24576-2026 (O&M). Date of Decision: 04.05.2026. MANINDER SINGH ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. PRESENT: Mr. Kshitij Sharma, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Shubhkarman Singh Gill, Advocate, and Mr. Himmat Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J (ORAL) Seeking quashing of the FIR bearing No.413, dated 07.10.2022, under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477-A and 120- B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 along with all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom including the order dated 28.01.2026 framing charge passed by the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Guhla, the instant petition has been filed. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner does not dispute that even though the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the order framing charge before the Court of Sessions, however, as he has sought the quashing of the FIR as well, he has chosen to approach the High Court. RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2026.05.05 18:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-24576-2026 (O&M). -2- It is deemed appropriat