Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-26

MANGAT RAM AND ANR. vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

Citation / case number
CRM-M 46198/2016
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MANGAT RAM AND ANR.
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M No.46198 of 2016 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 102 CRM-M No.46198 of 2016 (O&M) Date of decision:26.05.2026 Mangat Ram and another ......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ...... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Jitender Dhanda, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Ashish Pannu, Advocate for the respondent No.2. SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral): This is second petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 2. The extraordinary jurisdiction vested in this Court by virtue of Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been invoked in the present case, for quashing of complaint No.60 dated 07.02.2009, pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhiwani. The above methionine complaint has been filed by the respondent No.2 for the commission of offence punishable under Section 494 read with Section 120-B IPC. 3. In nut-shell the fact emerging from record are that the above mentioned complaint has been filed by the respondent No.2, against the petitioners, alleging the commission of offence punishable under Section 494 read with Section 120-B IPC. I