MAHABIR@MAHAVIR vs SURJEET AND OTHERS

116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-1503-2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.05.2026 Mahabir @ Mahavir ......Appellant Vs. Surjeet and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: None for the appellant. Respondents No.1 and 2 were proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 09.01.2015. Mr. Lalit Garg, Advocate, for respondent No.3-Insurance Co. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) 1. None had put in appearance on behalf of the appellant since 19.04.2023, therefore, on the last date of hearing, Registry was directed to issue notice to the appellant as well as his counsel for the date fixed. 2. As per office report, notice issued to the appellant has been received back served through his wife and learned counsel for the appellant has been informed through e-mail. 3. Despite service, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 4. In view of the above, this Court is now left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 01.05.2026 Virender W