Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-11

MADHUMATI vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CRA-S 477/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
MADHUMATI
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 202 CRA-S-477-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.05.2026 Madhumati …Appellant VERSUS State of Haryana and another ...Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Rattandeep S. Kingra, Advocate for Mr. D.S. Matya, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Paras Talwar, Sr. DAG Haryana. None for respondent No.2. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) Challenge in the instant appeal is to the order dated 07.02.2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram whereby the application for grant of anticipatory bail to the appellant in case bearing FIR No. 485 dated 15.10.2025 for offence(s) under Sections 140(1), 238, 309(6), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Sections 3(1)(s), 3(1)(z) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Section 24 of the Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Palam Vihar, District Gurugram, has been dismissed. 2. There is no representation on behalf of respondent No.2 despite service. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant inter alia contends that MANGAL SINGH 2026.05.12 09:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2