Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

madras High Court · 2026-05-29

Madhu Venkidu, Proprietor of Tvl.M.Venkidu Contrac vs Assistant Commissioner

Court
madras High Court
Petitioner
Madhu Venkidu, Proprietor of Tvl.M.Venkidu Contrac
Respondent
Assistant Commissioner
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

WP No. 20824 of 2026 N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-05-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN WP No. 20824 of 2026 AND WMP Nos. 22464 and 22465 of 2026 Madhu Venkidu, Proprietor of Tvl.M.Venkidu Contractor, 10/99, Mottur, M.Pallipati, Mettur, Salem -636458. ..Petitioner Vs Assistant Commissioner Mettur Assessment Circle, Kalaivani Shankar Thirumana Mahal, 6/1-182, Sakthi Nagar, Ramanagar, Mettur Dam - 636403. ..Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the Respondent leading to the issuance of Impugned Order passed by the Respondent Dated 14.04.2025 vide Ref No. ZD330425105084W/2023-2024 and quash the same, and consequently direct the Respondent to pass a fresh speaking order in accordance wit law. For Petitioner : Mr.Sathyanarayana A.G For Respondent : Ms.Amrita Poongodi Dinakaran Government Counsel __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 05/06/2026 03:52:05 pm ) WP No. 20824 of 2026 ORDER Heard both sides. 2.The petitioner suffered an exparte order at the hands of the respondent. The or

Madhu Venkidu, Proprietor of Tvl.M.Venkidu Contrac vs Assistant Commissioner · Niyam