MADHU SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB

On 21.05.2026, this Court had passed the following order:- “Learned counsel submits that the complaint has been registered after 14 years of the execution of the sale deed which was in the year 2012, while the complaint has been submitted on 26.12.2025, based on which the present FIR has been lodged; the petitioner is not the beneficiary; main allegation of forgery is against co- accused Jagdish Kumar Sharma; the land was mutated in favour of his mother and a civil suit is also pending inter se between the parties. He is not involved in any other criminal case and is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate. Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.S. Atwal, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Bhatnagar, Advocate has appeared; filed memo of appearance on behalf of the complainant and raised submissions in opposition. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.29 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Adjourned to 29.05.2026. Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 25.05.2026. In the event of his arrest, he shall be