Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-12

M/S VINAY AUTO PVT LTD vs NABH PARKASH & ANR

Citation / case number
CWP 163/2018
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
M/S VINAY AUTO PVT LTD
Respondent
NABH PARKASH & ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CWP-163-2018 -1- 107 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-163-2018 Date of Decision : 12.05.2026 M/S VINAY AUTO PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner VERSUS NABH PARKASH AND ANOTHER .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present : Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. G.S.Bal, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Avtar Singh, Advocate and Mr. Gurjeet Singh, Advocate, for respondent no.1. KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(Oral) 1. Through the instant petition, filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a challenge is thrown to the ex parte Award dated 01.04.2014 (Annexure P-2), passed by the Industrial Tribunal (respondent no.2), wherethrough, the reference was answered in favour of the workman, and he was held entitled for reinstatement in service with continuity of service with full back wages (last drawn salary of Rs.6763/-), from the date of his termination, i.e. 22.06.2011 till his reinstatement with all consequential benefits. He also seeks quashing of order dated 28.01.2015 (Annexure P-4), vide which the application preferred by the petitioner-management for setting aside ex parte Award, DHARAM VIR 2026.05.15 11:22 I attest to the accuracy