M/S ROHIT FOOD PRODUCTS & ORS vs NARESH KUMAR & ANR

-1- 113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-3693-2026 Date of Decision: 01.05.2026 M/S ROHIT FOOD PRODUCTS & OTHERS ....Petitioners Versus NARESH KUMAR & ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate for the petitioners. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) Present civil revision petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India has been preferred by petitioners/judgment debtors being aggrieved by order dated 27.03.2026 (Annexure P6), passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Budhlada, whereby application filed by respondent No.1/decree holder under Order XXI Rule 66 CPC has been allowed and sale warrants of attached property have been issued. 2. I do not find any error with the impugned order dated 27.03.2026. Mere filing of appeal or an application under order IX Rule 13 CPC would not make a judgment debtor entitled to stay the execution of decree passed in favour of decree holder. The petitioners/judgment debtors have got efficacious remedy with them and in the case of appeal they can always pray for stay of execution of decree by moving appropriate application under order XLI Rule 5 CPC and in cas