Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-01

M/S RATTAN CHAND SAW MILL vs UT OF CHANDIGARH

Citation / case number
RFA 5764/2012
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
M/S RATTAN CHAND SAW MILL
Respondent
UT OF CHANDIGARH
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

1 RFA-5764-2012 and other connected cases 118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-5764-2012 and other connected cases Date of Decision: May 01, 2026 M/S RATTAN CHAND SAW MILL . .......Appellant Versus UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH ........Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Rajiv Dhiman, Advocate and Mr. S.N. Kandpal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Sumeet Jain, Addl. Standing counsel, U.T. Chandigarh. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Vide this common order, a batch of 6 Regular First Appeal(s) shall stand disposed of, details of which are mentioned in the footnote of the judgment. For convenience, the facts are culled out from RFA-5764-2012. 2. By way of present appeal(s), challenge has been laid to the judgment dated 17.07.2012 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh (for short ‘Reference Court’) whereby the reference petition filed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by the appellant(s)-landowner(s), seeking enhancement of compensation was partly allowed. 3. Briefly stating, certain land, situated within the revenue estate of Village Manimajra, Chandigarh was