Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-05-04

M/S. RAJBIR TIMBER TRADERS vs ANIK WALIA

Citation / case number
CM(M)-1013/2026 2026:DHC:3778
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
M/S. RAJBIR TIMBER TRADERS
Respondent
ANIK WALIA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 04th May, 2026 CM(M) 1013/2026, CM APPL. 29818/2026, CM APPL. 29819/2026 & CM APPL. 29820/2026 M/S. RAJBIR TIMBER TRADERS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mankan Deep Singh Bammi, Mr. Manish Kumar and Ms. Nida Akhtar, Advocates. versus ANIK WALIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Parvez Bashista and Mr. Malay Misra, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the order dated 09th April, 2026, passed by the learned Trial Court in CS (COMM) No. 225/2023, whereby the application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order XVIII Rule 17 read with Order XVI Rule 1 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, (‘CPC’) seeking summoning of witnesses has been dismissed. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent appears on advance notice and accepts notice. 4. The matter is taken up for hearing today with the consent of the learned CM(M) 1013/2026 5. Heard. Record perused. 6. Learned counsel appearing