M/S HOTEL VENICE vs THE SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY CUM FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER CORPORATION,PUNJAB AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 201(2) CWP-19484-2022 Date of Decision: 11.05.2026 M/S HOTEL VENICE ...Petitioner Versus THE SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY-CUM-FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER CORPORATION, PUNJAB AND ORS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. Manbir Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Akhil Kamra, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Ashwani Prashar, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ***** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Mr. Prashar, counsel for respondent No.3-Bank, has placed on record copy of certificate, to submit that offer of One Time Settlement made by the petitioner has been accepted and entire repayment has been made. He submits that loan account has been closed. 2. Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the said assertion and submits that writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous ( SUVIR SEHGAL ) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) May 11, 2026 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HARISH KUMAR 2026.05.13 19:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment