Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21
LOVEJIT SINGH ALIAS LOVE ALIAS BHUND vs STATE OF PUNJAB
- Citation / case number
- CRA-D 486/2025
- Court
- Punjab and Haryana High Court
- Petitioner
- LOVEJIT SINGH ALIAS LOVE ALIAS BHUND
- Respondent
- STATE OF PUNJAB
Judgment text excerpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 4 CRA-D-486-2025 (O&M) Reserved on :25.03.2026 Pronounced on :21.05.2026 Uploaded on :21.05.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or the full Judgment is pronounced: Full Judgment LOVEJIT SINGH @ LOVE @ BHUND ... APPELLANT Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ... RESPONDENT CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. Tajveer Singh, Advocate (arguing counsel) Mr. Ashish Pundir, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Salil Sabhlok, Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ***** SANJIV BERRY, J. CRM-13134-2025 in CRA-D-486-2025 1. Heard on the application for condonation of delay. 2. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as mentioned in the application, delay of 112 days in filing of the instant appeal is allowed for the time being, subject to the final decision to be taken by the Apex Court in case Writ Petition (Crl.) No.114 of 2024, titled as Sushila Devi & Anr. vs. Union of India through NIA & Ors.’, wherein the question as to whether the limitation prescribed under Section 45(2) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 is mandatory or not. GYAN CHAND 2026.05