Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-25

LAKHWINDER SINGH @ LAKHA @ JAGGA vs UT OF CHANDIGARH

Citation / case number
CRM-M 14512/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
LAKHWINDER SINGH @ LAKHA @ JAGGA
Respondent
UT OF CHANDIGARH
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-14512-2026 (O&M) 1 212 2026:PHHC:082514 ieee IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-14512-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 25.05.2026 LAKHWINDER SINGH @ LAKHA @ JAGGA «PETITIONER VERSUS UT OF CHANDIGARH .+s RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. J.S. Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, PP, U.T., Chandigarh with Ms. Diksha Sharma, Advocate for U.T.-Chandigarh. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) 1. This is the first petition under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (439 Cr.P.C. 1973) for grant of Regular Bail to the petitioner in case F.I.R No. 03 dated 03.09.2024 under section 21 of NDPS and section 25 of Arms Act, 1959 and later on added section 54 of Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Crime Chandigarh, District UT Chandigarh. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has been further contended that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody for the last 01 year, 08 months and 22 days. It has been further contended that the challan has already been presented before