Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-18

KUSHALAYA DEVI AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 15329/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
KUSHALAYA DEVI AND ANOTHER
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15329-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 18.05.2026 Kushalaya Devi and others … Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Rahul Vijay Singh Chugh, Advocate, and Mr. Lokesh Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Amtiaz Sandhu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking setting aside of order dated 30.11.2025 whereby a committee constituted under Punjab Compensation to Victims of Animals Attack and Accident Policy, 2023 has rejected their claim. 2. As per petition, the petitioners are family members of Sukhwinder Singh who died in an accident which occurred due to a stray animal. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that respondent(s) has rejected petitioners’ claim on the ground that they have not produced any proof of initiation of proceedings in any Court after the incident which took place on 12.07.2017 and compensation policy came into force in 2023. The petitioners preferred CWP No.10406 of 2019, Kusha