Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-18

KUMARI ANUPAM AND OTHERS vs PRAYAG DAHIYA AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
FAO 6143/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
KUMARI ANUPAM AND OTHERS
Respondent
PRAYAG DAHIYA AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

2026:PHHC:077192 Bake de ee es -1- 111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-6143-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:18.05.2026 KUMARI ANUPAM AND OTHERS ... Appellants Versus PRAYAG DAHITYA AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Kunal Phogat, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for respondent No.2-Insurance Company. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) CM-21667-CH-2025 For the reasons mentioned in the application for condonation of delay of 85 days in filing the appeal, same is allowed and the delay of 85 days in filing the present appeal, is hereby condoned. Main case Present appeal has been filed by appellants-claimants being aggrieved by award dated 01.04.2025 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gurugram (hereinafter referred to as “Tribunal”) whereby total compensation of Rs.33,14,166/- was awarded to appellants-claimants on account of death of Abhinash Kumar (hereinafter referred to as ‘deceased’) in motor vehicular accident dated 07.02.2023, caused due to the rash and negligent of respondent No.1-driver-cum-owner while driving vehicle bearing registration No.DL-11CB-2105. RAVINDER DHANIA 2026.05.21 09:30