Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-20

KULDIP SINGH vs STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH

Citation / case number
CRM-M 24950/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
KULDIP SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-24950-2026 -1- 233 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24950-2026 Date of Decision: 20.05.2026 Kuldip Singh …Petitioner vs. State of U.T., Chandigarh and another …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Dinesh Maurya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh K. Sheoran, Addl. P.P., for U.T., Chandigarh with Mr. Hardeep Singh Poonia, Advocate Ms. Ojasvi, Advocate for the respondent-State. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No.126, dated 17.12.2025, under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B of IPC and Section 24 of Immigration Act, registered at Police Station Mauli Jagran, Chandigarh (Annexure P-1). 2. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner had offered that he was ready to amicably resolve all the dispute with respondent No.2 and to show his bona fides, he would bring a demand draft of Rs.7,00,000/- on the next date of hearing. 3. Today, during the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is unable to produ