Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-26

KULDIP SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

Citation / case number
CWP 9644/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
KULDIP SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

208-Urgent IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 9644 of 2026 O&M) Date of Decision: 26.05.2026 Kuldip Singh .......... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Raj Karan Singh Verka, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Abhinav Kalia, DAG, Haryana for respondent Nos. 1 & 4. Mr. Parminder Sandhu, Advocate for Mr. Harmanjot Singh Gill, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 & 3-HUDA. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner, by way of present petition, seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for directing respondent No. 4-Land Acquisition Collector, Panchkula, (hereinafter referred to as “LAC’) to re- determine and award the enhanced compensation as awarded by this Court vide order dated 15.10.2012 passed in RFA No. 2695 of 2002. [2] On 18.05.2026, this Court passed the following order:- “ The short grouse of petitioner / landowner is that an application preferred at his instance in terms of Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for short ‘the 1894 Act’ (annexure P-1 at pages 13-16) is pending adjudication with respondent No.4. Despite notice of moti