KULDEEP SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** 116 CWP-10161-2026 Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 KULDEEP SINGH …Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate and Mr. Abhinash, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate for petitioner Mr. Satya Pal Jain, A.S.G. with Ms. Neha Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel For respondent - U.O.I. Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate (through V.C.) with Mr. Rajat Thareja, Advocate For respondent No.3 - SBI *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking directions to de-freeze his Bank Account maintained with respondent No.3-State Bank of India. 2. Reply dated 26.05.2026 filed on behalf of respondent No.3 is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place. SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.05.27 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent- Bank has frozen petitioner’s account without notice. As per petitioner’s information, the Bank has acted upon directions of Law Enfo