KULDEEP SINGH vs THE STATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH ITS CHIEF MANAGER

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** 116 CWP-11328-2026 Date of Decision: 25.05.2026 KULDEEP SINGH …Petitioner Versus THE STATE BANK OF INDIA & OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate (through V.C) with Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Geeta Sharma, Advocate For respondent Nos. 1 to 3 - Bank Mr. Vikas Arora, D.A.G., Punjab *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to de-freeze his bank account maintained with State Bank of India. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent- Bank has frozen petitioner’s account without notice. As per petitioner’s information, the Bank has acted upon directions of Law Enforcement Agencies. He is not involved in any criminal activity. He is not named in any FIR relating to financial fraud, if any, committed by unknown persons. There SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.05.26 15:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- is entry of ₹67,000/- which has been credited in his account by unscrupulous ones. There i