Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21

KULDEEP SHARMA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 25935/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
KULDEEP SHARMA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-25935 of 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 214 CRM-M-25935 of 2026 Date of Decision: 21.05.2026 Kuldeep Sharma ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Anand Rohilla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sankalp, Advocate for the complainant. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J (ORAL) 1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.48 dated 19.03.2026 registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 24 of Immigration Act, at Police Station Barauda, District Sonipat. 2. Brief facts as per the prosecution case are that the petitioner along with other co-accused, cheated the complainant for a sum of Rs.32,95,000/-, on the pretext of sending him abroad. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He argued that the petitioner is neither beneficiary of the alleged fraud, nor has any concern DINESH BANSAL 2026.05.22 16:49 I attest to the ac