Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-18

KULDEEP KAUR AND ANR vs JASWINDER SINGH

Citation / case number
CR 4035/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
KULDEEP KAUR AND ANR
Respondent
JASWINDER SINGH
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CR No.4035 of 2026 (O&M) -1- S. No.130 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR No.4035 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:18.05.2026 Kuldeep Kaur and another .....Petitioners Vs. Jaswinder Singh .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present:- Mr. P.S. Punia, Advocate for the petitioners. **** Yashvir Singh Rathor, J. (Oral) 1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 22.04.2026 vide which the petitioners- plaintiffs have been directed to affix ad-volarem Court fee on the amount of earnest money of Rs.70 lakhs on an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC moved by defendant. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have perused the material placed on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioners- plaintiffs have filed a suit for declaration to the effect that the agreement to sell dated 4.3.2024 executed by plaintiffs in favour of defendant stands cancelled and the amount of earnest money paid by defendant stands forfeited on the ground that defendant has failed to get the sale deed executed within the given time. However, the trial Court has wrongly directed them to affix the a