KRUNAL YOGESH SANGHVI vs STATE OF HARYANA

336 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-16893-2026 Date of decision: 14.05.2026 KRUNAL YOGESH SANGHVI ...PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Satbir Singh Goripuria, DAG, Haryana. **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (ORAL) 1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Pradeep, submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation and he is not required by the police at this stage, for further investigation or custodial interrogation. 3. In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and order of interim bail dated 27.03.2026 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (SUBHAS MEHLA) May 14, 2026 JUDGE manisha (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable Yes/No MANISHA 2026.05.14 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document