KRISHNA AND ANOTHER vs RAKESH AGGARWAL AND ANOTHER

2026:PHHC:069241 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2559 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: .05.05.2026 Krishna and another ...Petitioners VS Rakesh Aggarwal and another ..- Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate & Dr. Ameena Upmanyu, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vineet Kumar Jakhar, Advocate Mr, Gurminder Singh Phull, & Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate for the respondents. 2k eee VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) The instant petition, preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assails the order dated 26.02.2026 (Annexure P-9) passed by the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ganaur vide which the application moved by the respondent/defendant No.1 under Order 26 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (for short the ‘CPC’) seeking permission to summon an expert witness for voice matching analysis of respondent No.1 with the voice in the pen drive produced by the petitioners was allowed. 2. On 24.03.2026, a Coordinate Bench passed the following order:- “Learned Senior counsel representing the petitioners inter alia submits that the petitioner shall have no grouse in case the alr