Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-27

KRISHAN KUMAR vs SHRI MURLI MANOHAR THATHERAN PANCHAYATI MANDIR & DHARAMSHALA SAMITI

Citation / case number
INCOMP 1217/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
KRISHAN KUMAR
Respondent
SHRI MURLI MANOHAR THATHERAN PANCHAYATI MANDIR & DHARAMSHALA SAMITI
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

INCOMP-1217-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (141) INCOMP-1217-2026 Date of Decision : 27.05.2026 Krishan Kumar ...Appellant Versus Shri Murli Monohar Thatheran Panchayati Mandir and Dharamshala Samiti (Registered) and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: None. *** Amarinder Singh Grewal, J. (Oral) 1. Present regular second appeal was filed in the year 2026 wherein, objection was raised by the Registry and thereafter, no one has bothered to clear the said objection and the incomplete appeal is still pending with the Registry of this Court and the same has been listed so as to weed out the same as the appeal is consuming limited space available. 2. As per Rule 9, Chapter I, Part-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it, to be re-filed within a total period of 40 days. The same was not taken back for re-filing too after the removal of objections and the case is listed before the Court for orders. 3. Keeping in view the fact that no one has come forward to clear the objectio