KRISHAN KUMAR vs BALRAM AND OTHERS

153 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-637-2024 Date of decision: 18.05.2026 Krishan ...Appellant Versus Balram and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Akash Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Arvind Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Amit Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Pankaj Mehta, Advocate for respondent No.3. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that he is not aware as to what transpired in the mediation proceedings. It is thus, submitted that the present appeal be disposed but liberty be granted to the appellant to revive the same after finding out as to what transpired in the mediation proceedings and by mentioning the said fact in the application. 2. In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of with liberty aforesaid. 18.05.2026 (VIKAS BAHL) Pawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.05.18 16:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document