Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-22

KRISHAN ALIAS KURE RAM vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 14433/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
KRISHAN ALIAS KURE RAM
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-14433-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 211 CRM-M-14433-2026 Date of decision: 22.05.2026 KRISHAN ALIAS KURE RAM ......PETITIONER Versus STATE OF HARYANA ..... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Ankur Lal, Advocate for the petitioner (Through V.C.). Ms. Deepali Verma, Asstt. A.G. Haryana. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. 1. This petition for bail is the first petition, filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. This petition has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.575 dated 05.11.2025 for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(3), 336(4), 338, 340(2), 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Police Station Sadar, District Bhiwani. 2. Briefly stating the facts emerging from record are that the FIR of this case came into being at the instance of ‘Suman and others’, hereinafter being referred to as ‘complainants’ only. The pith and substance of the above- mentioned complaint was that the Directors/Proprietors of a company namely VIPIN KUMAR 2026.05.22 19:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-14433-2026