KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED vs STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 142 CWP-16508-2026 Date of Decision: 25.05.2026 KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Ms. Ankita Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been filed inter alia for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.2 to 4 to provide assistance in handing over the physical possession of the secured asset. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that order dated 09.03.2026 (Annexure P-1) has been passed by District Magistrate, Sonipat under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short, ‘SARFAESI Act’), but despite a lapse of more than two and a half months, physical possession of the secured asset has not been delivered. 3. Advance copy of the petition has been served upon the official respondents. 4. On asking, State counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondents-State. He does not have any instructions. 5. Having heard counsel for parties an