KOMMINENI AJAY BABU vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 15.05.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 1927/2026, CRL.M.A. 15613/2026 & CRL.M.A. 15612/2026 KOMMINENI AJAY BABU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Lakshit Chaudhary and Mr. Sarthak Udaipuria, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with Inspector Ajay Kumar CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/application seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 36/2026 of PS Special Cell for offence under Section 308/318(4)/319/340 BNS. 2. Broadly speaking, prosecution case is that the accused/applicant is involved in a financial fraud whereby the complainant de facto was cheated of Rs.1,04,49,999/- and the said amount was transferred to the bank BAIL APPLN. 1927/2026 Page 1 of 5 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af 3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, KATHPALIA st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b 40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.05.15 05:34:27 +05'30' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:15.05.2026 17:41:29 accounts of the business entities, with which the accused/applicant is connected. Out of the allegedly cheated amount, a sum of Rs.50,00,000/- was transferred into ICICI bank account of the business entity run by the accused/applicant. 3. Against the above backdrop, learned counsel for accused/applicant contends that he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted by learned counsel that the FIR was registered against some unknown person and it does not spell out the complete details of the alleged offence. It is al