Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21

KIRPAL SINGH GHATTARODY AND ORS. vs MANJIT SINGH FLORA AND ORS.

Citation / case number
CR 4308/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
KIRPAL SINGH GHATTARODY AND ORS.
Respondent
MANJIT SINGH FLORA AND ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

-1- 133 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-4308-2026 Date of Decision:21.05.2026 KIRPAL SINGH GHATTARODY AND ORS. ...PETITIONERS Versus MANJIT SINGH FLORA AND ORS. ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Shubham Gupta, Advocate Mr. D. P. Gupta, Advocate Ms. Anchita Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) Present civil revision petition has been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by petitioners-defendant Nos.1 to 6 being aggrieved by impugned order dated 13.02.2026 (Annexure P-5) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jalandhar, whereby the defence of petitioners-defendant Nos.1 to 6 was struck off and by order dated 09.04.2026 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalandhar (Annexure P-8) dismissing his application under Section 147 of CPC, 1908. 2. That respondent No.1-plaintiff had preferred a suit against petitioners-defendant Nos.1 to 6 seeking relief of permanent injunction restraining petitioners-defendant Nos.1 to 6 from interfering into alleged peaceful possession of respondent No.1-plaintiff in suit property. That petitioners-defendant Nos.1 to 6 were proceed