KAVITA vs STATE OF HARYANA

334 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10495-2026 Date of decision: 14.05.2026 KAVITA @ KAVITA DEVI ...PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Navmohit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Surender Singh Pannu, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is no more required in this case. 2. Learned State counsel has not refuted the aforesaid assertions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and further, on instructions from Investigating Officer, submits that the petitioner is not required by the police for further investigation or custodial interrogation. 3. In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and order of interim bail dated 23.02.2026 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (SUBHAS MEHLA) May 14, 2026 JUDGE manisha (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable Yes/No MANISHA 2026.05.14 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integri