KARNAIL SINGH AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ree 2026:PHHC:074733 ate (106) CRM-M-16839-2026 DATE OF DECISION: 13.05.2026 Karnail Singh and another wo... Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab suse. Respondent CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present Mr.Digvijay Nagpal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Anup Singh, AAG, Punjab. Lid SUBHAS MEHLA, J (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to order dated 27.03.2026, passed by this Court, the petitioners have joined the investigation on 08.04.2026 and their custodial interrogation is no more required in this case. 2. Learned State counsel has not refuted the aforesaid assertions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and further, on instructions from ASI Lakhmir Singh, submits that the petitioners are not required by the police for further investigation or custodial interrogation. 3. In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and order of interim bail dated 27.03.2026, passed by this Court, is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. 13.05.2026 (SUBHAS MEHLA) mamta JUDGE Whether speaki