KARAMBIR SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 124 CM-10019-CII-2026 in/and CR-4017-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.05.2026 Karambir Singh …Petitioner V/s State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Dr. R.N. Bharati, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against the impugned order, the petitioner intends to file an appeal. He has, however, expressed an apprehension as regards limitation coming in his way. He submits that under the circumstances, he may be permitted to withdraw the instant revision petition and a direction be issued to the Court concerned to condone the delay in filing the appeal. 2. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant revision petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal, in accordance with law. 3. If the petitioner files an application under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the same shall be considered sympathetically. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE May 13, 2026 vcgarg Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whe