Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-14

KAMLA @ PUSHPA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRR 2653/2023
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
KAMLA @ PUSHPA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRR-2653-2023 1- 105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-2653-2023 Date of Decision:14.05.2026 Kamla @ Pushpa …Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and Ors. …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present: Mr.Pardeep Duhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, Sr.DAG, Haryana. None for respondents No.2 and 3. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. 1. The petitioner has filed the present revision petition against the impugned order dated 26.10.2023, passed by the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hisar, whereby, the statement made by the Public Prosecutor was accepted and the evidence of the prosecution was closed by the Court. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner/complainant contends that the petitioner had lodged one FIR No. 518, dated 05.08.2021, under Sections 302 and 341 of IPC, registered at Police Station HTM, Hisar against respondents/accused in the present case. At the time of occurrence, Kamla @ Pushpa (PW-2) and Rajo (PW-15), eye witnesses were present at the place of occurrence and the occurrence was captured in the C.C.T.V, installed at the place of occurrence. Even, C.C.T.V footage was taken in a pendrive and the application under