KAMESHWAR KUMAR RAI & ORS. vs PARAG KARUNAKAR SINGH & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

` $~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 13.05.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 821/2025, CM APPL. 32108/2026 KAMESHWAR KUMAR RAI & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar, Sr. Adv. alongwith Ms. Medha Tandon and Ms. Jayati Tandon, Advocates. versus PARAG KARUNAKAR SINGH & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. R.K. Dhawan, SC for NDMC alongwith Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Ms. Nisha Dhawan and Mr. Pawan Karan Deo, Advocates for R1 and R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners alleging wilful disobedience/non-compliance with the directions contained in the order dated 05.02.2024 passed in W.P.(C) 632/2024. 2. It transpires from the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents that on 27.05.2025, an Assessment Order has been passed qua the property in question. The same has been passed on the basis of bifurcation of the Revised Value (RV) of the concerned property. 3. It appears that the petitioners’ primary request, as recorded in the aforesaid order dated 05.02.2024, as regards working out of bifurcated RV has been acceded to. 4. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners strenuously contends that Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ROHIT CONT.CAS(C) 821/2025 Page 1 of 2 KUMAR PATEL Signing Date:18.05.2026 10:25:37 ` there are other aspects of the matter which have not been considered in the Assessment Order dated 27.05.2025. 5. After some hearing, it is agreed that the petitioners would avail the prescribed appellate remedies against the aforesaid Assessment Order dated 27.05.2025 (Annexure R1 to the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents). 6. Let an appeal be filed before the appellate authority within a period of 4 weeks from today. 7. Let the appell