KAMALJIT KAUR vs DRT III CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

2026 PHHC:082519-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (124) CWP-10420-2026 Date of decision:- 25.05.2026 Kamaljit Kaur ... Petitioner Versus DRT III Chandigarh and others -» Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. Naveen Sheokand, Advocate, for the petitioner. ee ee SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Perusal of the petition as well as the relief claimed shows that the primary grievance of petitioner is qua order dated 13.11.2024, Annexure P-27, passed by the DRT. Petitioner has sought a direction from this Court to respondents No.1 to review its own order. 2. Petitioner has been asked as to whether DRT has a power to review its order. The answer by the counsel for the petitioner is in the negative. 3. When confronted with the availability of an alternate remedy under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to take recourse to the same. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. ( SUVIR SEHGAL ) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) 25.05.2026 JUDGE Kamal