KAMALJIT KAUR AND OTHERS vs SURINDER PAL SINGH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 128 CR-4243-2026 (O&M) Date of decision:20.05.2026 KAMALJIT KAUR AND OTHERS ...PETITIONERS VERSUS SURINDER PAL SINGH ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Hitesh Kalra, Advocate and Mr. Pritam Sharma, Advocate for petitioners. *** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) Present civil revision petition has been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by petitioners-objectors being aggrieved by dismissal of their objections under Order XXI Rule 97 read with Section 47 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’) by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jalandhar vide impugned order dated 15.04.2026. 2. Facts of present case are not in dispute. Plaintiff-decree holder had preferred a suit for partition of joint property owned by him and defendant-judgment debtor, measuring 03 kanals 18 marlas as described in the plaint. Respondent-decree holder had claimed half share in the said suit property. 3. The suit was contested by defendant-judgment debtor and on merits preliminary decree for partition was duly passed by learned Court of First Instance. Subsequent to passing of preliminary decree for part