KALU RAM vs STATE OF HARYANA

138 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-4110-2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.05.2026 Kalu Ram ......Appellant Vs. State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) 1. None had put in appearance on behalf of the appellant since 03.02.2025, therefore, on the last date of hearing, Registry was directed to issue notice to the appellant as well as his counsel for the date fixed. 2. As per office report, notice issued to the appellant has been received back with the report that he has expired and learned counsel for the appellant has been informed through e-mail. 3. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 4. In view of the above, this Court is now left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. Liberty is, however, reserved to the legal representatives of the appellant to move an application to revive the present appeal in case any cause of action survives. 7. Pending application(s), if any