KAJAL AND OTHERS vs DEEN MOHD AND OTHERS

FAO-198-2024 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-198-2024 (O&M) KAJAL AND OTHERS. ......Appellants Vs. DEEN MOHD AND ORS. ......Respondents Reserved on: 15.05.2026 Pronounced on: 18.05.2026 Uploaded on : 21.05.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Manish Jain, Advocate Mr. Ketan Antil, Advocate for the appellants. None for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for respondent No.3-Insurance Company. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 09.10.2023 passed in the claim petition filed under Section 166 and 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short ‘1988 Act’), by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rewari (for short, 'the Tribunal’) for enhancement of compensation granted to the claimants to the tune of Rs.1,34,79,760/- along with interest @ 7 % per annum, on account of death of Sarvesh Mudgal in a Motor Vehicular Accident, occurred on 16.05.2022. 2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to quantum of compensation awarded by th